March 16, 2017 · 1:07 pm
The ongoing debate about about health care continues. Is the ACA better than Trumpcare? Is Trumpcare better because it includes more free market choices? Is Obamacare better because it covers 24,000,000 more people? What about the deficit.
And so forth.
But there is one fact, one truth, one absolute “know” that all sides of the debate seem to accept at face value. If you can disabuse yourself of this “truth” the health care issue can be solved. There is one “given” that no one from Sanders to Clinton to Trump to Cruz or any of their associates seems to challenge. That given is the following fallacy
Companies provide health insurance to employees. The government supplies health insurance to employees. Health insurance costs “job creators” billions of dollars a year.
False. Absolutely false.
There is not now, never has been and never will be any company or school district or government that provides health insurance to the employee. Every employee from the highest to the lowest paid. In every industry. In every business. In every time period. Every employee has always paid and will always pay their own health insurance costs. Period.
Health insurance costs are not taken out of profits. They are not taken out of investors’ dividends. They are taken out of the employee’s salary. Every time.
Anyone who has ever been involved in negotiating contracts should understand this. As should anyone who has an understanding of basic economic theory. Every employer , whether public or private, has an amount of money that it sets aside for the “cost of labor”. Part of that “cost of labor” is benefits. One of those costly benefits is health insurance.
Does anyone think, really, that health insurance is some “gift” from an employer? Really? Never. The cost of health insurance is simply deducted from the employee’s salary as part of the “cost of labor”. The employee takes a lower salary and pays for his own insurance.
Does anyone really think that a business negotiates a contract and then, out of the goodness of its heart, just adds on health insurance? Really?
Once you understand that you, as an employee pay for your own insurance you realize how vile the CEOs of companies like Hobby Lobby truly are. Hobby Lobby employees pay for their own insurance, yet the Supreme Court has decreed that the CEO of Hobby Lobby can dictate the kind of coverage the employee has paid for. Ludicrous.
So, next time someone tells you that their employer is “providing health insurance” and so the employer should be able to dictate what coverage they can have. Set them straight. Tell them they pay for their own insurance. And will continue to do so. Even though their boss may dictate what kind of coverage they get.
Your employer “gives” you health insurance. The big fat heath insurance lie. And another reason why we should have a single payer option. After all, the workers are paying for health insurance, shouldn’t they decide what option they want?
Filed under ACA, Congress, Cruz, economics, Economy, government, healthcare, Hobby Lobby, logic, Obamacare, Politics, Society, unions, United States, workers
Tagged as ACA, common sense, economics, employee, employee rights, health care, health insurance, Trumpcare
March 26, 2014 · 10:28 am
Quick background. The company called Hobby Lobby, owned by a family called the Greens, does not want to pay for part of the health care for some of it’s workers. This is basic preventative health care covered , by law, under the ACA. They don’t like some of the forms of birth control, which they claim are abortions. While the medical and scientific evidence refutes that claim, that is not the point.
The point is that the Greens want to exempt themselves from the law based on their personal religious beliefs . This raises a number of issues, only one of which I will touch on today. There are other issues to be examined at a later date. But today the issue is the Green support for “sexual deviance”.
Are the owners of Hobby Lobby trying to force deviant sexual practices on their employees? And should a company be able to encourage their employees to engage in sexually deviant behavior, directly or indirectly?
Let me explain. The Greens oppose the idea of abortion. They also oppose having to pay for any contraceptive that they consider to be abortion inducing . They reserve the right to define the drug and then refuse to pay insurance costs associated with their findings. It should be noted that at least some of the contraceptives they find to be abortion inducing are not . But the court did not delve into the scientific validity of their claims, only their genuinely held beliefs. So be it. Some folks believe that dinosaurs walked with man. So be it.
So, what the Greens are saying is that if their employees participate in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, the Greens oppose providing the means to prevent or abort that pregnancy. Keep following this. So, if an employee of Hobby Lobby and her husband have sexual relations in which the husband carefully (or not so carefully) inserts his penis into the employee’s vagina, then the Greens get upset. They will not pay for certain contraceptives that might lead to the sexual act NOT producing a bouncing bundle of joy. So, the Greens are telling their employees that every personal sex act between a husband and wife is now the business of the Green family, because they employ one of the parties at their store. OK.
Oddly, however, the Greens are actually using an economic incentive to encourage couples to engage in non-copulatory sexual behavior. Oral sex will not lead to pregnancy. The Greens are encouraging it. Anal sex will not lead to pregnancy. The Greens are saying to their employees. Go For It. Homosexual activity will not result in pregnancy. To the Greens, that is A-OKAY in their book. I must suppose that bestiality must be number one in the “Hobby Lobby Guide to Employee Sex Practices”. After all, the ACA does not cover vet bills.
So, we must ask ourselves. Are the Greens, under the guise of religious “freedom” actually encouraging their employees to engage in all kinds of sexual activity. Do they get a vicarious thrill from the thought of their workers going home and engaging in a variety of sexual practices, many of which were illegal only a few decades ago ? Does it excite their corporate religious fervor ? We cannot know and I am only asking. I am not sure where this will lead, but I suspect in the end it will unravel as a communist plot to ensure deviant sexual practices are mandated in America. Obama’s fault. I can feel it coming.
Next up, another essay on the corporate rights.
Filed under ACA, healthcare, homosexual, neoconservatives, Obamacare, Religion, Supreme Court
Tagged as abortion, ACA, anal sex, bestiality, birth control, boyfriend, contraception, contraceptive, corporate rights, corporations, employee, employee rights, gay, gay rights, girlfriend, Green, health care, Hobby Lobby, homosexual, husband, labor law, Obamacare, oral sex, sex, sexual deviance, sexual deviants, sexuality, supreme court, wife, women, women's rights